That's the thing where users really get inspired by Cape because they can start thinking about all of the ways they can encrypt data, move it to the cloud, and process it in the cloud in that encrypted form. So it's a trade-off between data use and data security. But then you're losing a lot of the benefits of the cloud because when you go to use the data, you either need to download it to decrypt it, or upload the encryption key. Moving to cloud-based storage in itself is not the issue because they know they can client-side encrypt the data before they upload it, keeping the key on-premise. The problem is that they don't want to move their highly confidential data to the cloud because, once they do, they don't control everything like they did on-premise. And so organizations want to move to the cloud. It's easier to scale up, and it's easier to scale down if you need to. We know that there's good reason for organizations to move to the cloud, largely driven by cost. Gavin: We deal with a lot of financial services companies who have highly confidential data that they tend to keep on-premise, because they control the environment. Reesha: How do the capabilities of the Cape Privacy platform inspire users, and what are some of the surprising things that they've done with it? Finally, Gavin offers an inspiring vision of what's possible when data–and individual privacy–is protected by default.* * Then he explains why Cape Privacy's partnership with Snowflake is the ideal combination for financial services organizations. In Part Two, Gavin describes what happens when an organization grasps the idea that they can keep data encrypted and still put it to work–in the cloud. Cape Privacy's Head of Marketing Reesha Dedhia recently sat down for a two-part conversation with the company's Co-Founder and CTO, Gavin Uhma.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |